L'HEXA-DOM "Regards sur L'Actu"

7 commentaires sur “Parodie : un sacré trio ..”

1. Peace a noun, while shalom a verb. The verb requires trust. No trust No Shalom. The noun simply a nice name and nothing more. Hence political rhetoric employs continuously the Pie in the Sky bull shit of « Peace ».

   Learning out to discern like from like defines « understanding. Another example:

   Distinguishing between Mercy from Pity

   johncoyote·john-coyote.com

   Have mercy.
   Have mercy Pretty girl, she told me. Chameleons faces we do have. We have become strangers to our self, forgot who we were. Once we were whiskey drinking people, who ….
   ___________________________
   ___________________________

   John mercy not the same as pity. Mercy the 4th tohor middah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev which the church categorically denies. Torah law, something which the NT writers systematically refused to define. Torah law a legal judicial common law jurisprudence and determination of government rule – known as “Legislative Review”. Wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts not only can declare a law passed by the Legislative or Executive Branches as unconstitutional. Legislative Review takes Judicial government one step further. The Great Sanhedrin court re-writes the questioned constitutionality of a law passed by Congress or the Executive and thereafter re-introduces this court re-written law. This process known as “Mishna Torah”.

   The 4th middah of the Oral Torah stands separate and distinct from pity. Torah common law stands upon precedents. Torah commandments qualify as legal precedent in this common law legal system. Three precedent by which a person can interpret the middah of Mercy: 1. The commandment to slaughter all inhabitants of Canaan Man, Woman, and child. 2. The commandment to make eternal war against Amalek. 3. The commandment to kill the stubborn and rebellious child.

   The Torah oath brit alliance – actively entails blessing and curse polarities. If actions have their consequences like the ripple effect of a stone thrown into a pond, then these 3 negative commandments listed above they prevent a Torah curse to curse the people of Israel. No pity shown not to the people of Canaan, nor to Amalek, nor to the child who qualifies as a rebellious son. Herein distinguishes the tohor middah of Mercy from the notion of taking pity upon someone or something.

   J’aimeJ’aime

   Réponse

   • Selective Memories

     loboteroIn Saner Thought

     Historical Events
     NOTE: This is not necessarily about the current mash-up in Gaza just a few observations that I have made in my many years.

     I would like to reiterate that I am NOT anti-Jew, personally I do not give a shit about their religious beliefs.

     This post is more about the selective memories of the American people than it is about the current situation.

     WARNING: This post may include some offensive language that may offend the sensibilities of some readers….so if you are easily offended then maybe this post is not for you.

     The date is 04 November 1979….US ally Iran has had months of protests against the policies and tactics of the Shah and on this date Iranian students stormed the walls of the US embassy in Tehran breaching them and taking 52 Americans hostage which were held for 444 days until their release on 20 January 1981.

     Since that fateful day Americans have despised anything remotely Iranian. (There so much more to that action than just a bunch of pissed off students)

     To this day they, Iran, can do nothing right in the eyes of most Americans….for they are evil.

     The date is 08 June 1967….during the 6 Day war when Israel was fighting against the combined forces of the Arab nations.

     The US signit ship, USS Liberty, was patrolling in the Eastern Mediterranean….when suddenly the ship was attacked by Israeli jets and gunboats….the attack left 34 American sailors dead and 174 wounded.

     Yet Americans ignore this murderous attack and support Israel in everything they do….why?

     If you are interested, which you are not, I have a post the has articles about this attack….fucking read them and see what our good ally is capable of doing.
     ___________________________
     ___________________________

     Prior to the outbreak of the 2nd Israeli War of Independence, commonly referred to by Goyim as the June 6 Day War, France – not the US – functioned as the key ally to the Jewish state. Charles de Gaulle duplicated the British treachery. In 1939 PM Chamberlain’s London passed the 2nd White Paper which sealed the borders of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate to Jews seeking to flee from the Nazi barbarians. FDR supported the British White Paper betrayal of the League of Nation Balfour Declaration Palestine Mandate of 1922 when the US closed its borders as well to all European Jews seeking refuge from the Nazi barbarians. Neither Churchill nor FDR consented to bomb the rail lines leading to the Death Camps, despite this Nazi abomination clearly known and exposed by 1942.

     President Truman, to his great credit, the first country to recognize the independent Jewish state in 1948. Eight years following Israeli Independence England and France engaged a military alliance with Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion. England and France sought to seize the Suez Canal away from Nasser after the Egyptian President nationalized the Suez Canal as a means to pay off the huge expense required to build the Aswan Dam/Nasser Lake.

     England and France mutually faced the collapse of their respective empires. Both Algeria and Vietnam demanded their National Independence and freedom from their French aristocratic feudal over-lords. The loss of the crown of the British empire – India & Pakistan directly threatened the First World Great Power status of England post WWII. Hence both London and France consoled the collapse of their respective world empires by dreaming of stealing the Suez Canal away from Nasser’s Egypt.

     Incompetent France and England both failed to seize the Suez Canal, despite tiny Israel’s success at capturing the whole of the Sinai desert from the Egyptian Army. What a disgrace! President IKE compounded this 2nd tier status of both England and France in the Middle East by insisting that Israel return the captured Sinai and England and France peddle their papers elsewhere. Israel obeyed the command of President IKE – the post WWII Super-Power of the Planet Earth.

     The USSR successfully competed with the dominance of the US when it acquired nuclear capabilities in August 1949. Both President IKE and Secretary Stalin directly rejected the notion that England and France could seize the Suez Canal. Such a radical action would have dramatically changed the balance of power in the Middle East, wherein England and France would sit as equals to the US and USSR. President IKE forcibly declared: “HELL NO!”

     The French turn to betray Israel came just prior to the outbreak of the June War of 1967. President Nasser swore that in this war the Arabs would complete the Nazi Shoah and throw the Jews into the Sea. Tel Aviv took Nasser serious and ordered the digging of mass graves. The June War of ’67 turned out to become the 2nd Israeli War of Independence! Charles De Gaulle like PM Chamberlain before him betrayed the French alliance with Israel, by declaring French neutrality just prior to the outbreak of hostilities. London and Paris gambled that Nassers’ horse would win the Derby Race. Ooops.

     During the June War President LBJ – tied down in Vietnam. LBJ too broke faith with President IKE just like he might have involvement with the Kennedy assassination! President IKE demanded that Israel return the Sinai back to Egypt in return for both Stalin and himself slapping London and Paris as second rate powers in the Middle East. LBJ permitted England and France to become the chief authors of UN Security Council Chapter VI Resolution 242. A UN Chapter VII Resolution resulted in the Korean War. UN 242, despite being merely a Chapter VI “suggestion” has evolved unto a “Pie in the Sky” ONLY two-state solution dictate! This Resolution constitutes revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost the June 1967 War; that Israel merely illegally occupies Samaria and Gaza! This UN propaganda stinks as bad as the UN joining Hamas in the Oct7th 2023 pogrom invasion of Israel; and the ICC declaration which assumes that Israeli leaders bear the Shoah guilt of genocide!

     LBJ elevated England and France back to a first tier status in determining the balance of power in the Middle East by allowing the European disgraceful lie that pretends that Arabs did not lose the June 1967 War. That England and France as first tier Great Powers have the right to dictate to Israel the terms of UN peace, known collectively as UN Resolution 242. Where does the USS Liberty fit into this equation of betrayal?

     Prior to the June 1967 War the US in no shape manner or form qualified as a major ally of the Jewish state. Post the ’67 War with the coward betrayal by De Gaul, only then did the US become the key major power ally of the Jewish state. The USS Liberty served the purpose as a spy ship. It had acquired key information of Israeli strategic tank formations positioned within the Sinai desert. It attempted to communicate these critical Israeli tank formations using a code that the Mossad knew that the Soviets had broken and deciphered. Israel could ill afford to permit the Egyptians to gain this critical information. Therefore the IDF bombed the USS Liberty spy shit into submission.

     J’aimeJ’aime

     Réponse

2. DISGRACEFUL. The story of a Jewish convert to the Catholic Church during the Xtian Shoah pogroms.
   Ehrenberg lived during a time when antisemitism was prevalent in many parts of Europe, including Germany. This period saw the rise of nationalist movements and ideologies that often scapegoated Jews for various societal issues. The rise of the Nazi Party in the 1930s brought about extreme antisemitic policies, culminating in the Shoah.

   This environment profoundly affected Jewish intellectuals and communities, including Ehrenberg. As an assimilated Jewish intellectual who converted to Catholicism, Ehrenberg likely encountered antisemitism firsthand, which directly influenced his perspectives and writings. His experiences provide an assimilationist traitors’ counter-narrative to the prevailing antisemitic attitudes of his time. Hans Ehrenberg converted to Xtianity in 1926.

   His conversion was significant in the context of the rise of Hitler to power. Especially as it reflected the complex interplay between his former Jewish heritage and his active engagement with Xtian theological dogma. Ehrenberg’s experiences and perspectives as a Jewish convert to Catholic Xtianity contributed to his philosophical and theological explorations, particularly regarding the relationship between Judaism and Xtianity.

   Ehrenberg’s views as a Xtian convert regarding the Talmud and Judaism reflect the broader tensions between Judaism and Xtianity during this time of Xtian pogroms. After converting to Xtianity in 1926, Ehrenberg felt a need to reconcile his Jewish heritage with his new faith. This often led earlier Jewish converts to adopt openly hostile & critical views of their former faith which prioritized the righteous pursuit of justice as faith and fear of Heaven. His hostility did not limit itself to only the Talmud. His coward racial hatred included the Hebrew T’NaCH as the foundation of Jewish common law legalism. The Talmud which asserted a central to Jewish law and tradition following its publication in about 450CE. Ehrenberg joined their ranks of the many other assimilated “Reform Jews” who grew to despise the Torah obligation to pursue judicial justice among the Jewish people.

   A Jewish Xtian convert caused the Church of Rome in 1242 to burn all the hand written Talmudic manuscripts in Paris. This stark precedent aroused the Nazi book burnings in the 1930s. Ehrenberg’s work often exposed his hostile relationship between Judaism and Xtianity. His reflections on the Shoah and the Church’s evil responses directly influenced his views on interfaith denunciations which sought to invalidate any need for church to acknowledgment its Av tuma past war crimes and guilt against Humanity.

   Many Jewish intellectuals and other leaders during and after the Shoah expressed their deep absolute revulsion and anger at the Catholic Church’s immoral indifference to the plight of Jews. Particularly the cowardly and utterly immoral crimes committed under Pope Pius XII, who betrayed “its” sub-human moral authority to speak out against the atrocities committed by both the Nazis and the Allies.

   Jewish intellectuals and leaders denounced Pius XII for not speaking out forcefully against the Nazi regime or the Allied White Paper and US closing its borders to Jewish refugees, and refusal to bomb the rail-lines leading to the Death Camps. This “sentiment”, widespread among Jewish communities and intellectuals during and after the war. Ehrenberg did not denounce the guilt of the Xtian church. But he did denounce the Talmud in his writings, reflecting his negative perspective on its impact upon shaping the cultures and customs observed by the chosen Cohen people.

   Ehrenberg criticized the Talmud as a source of legalism and as a barrier to understanding the essence of faith. He viewed it as contributing to a rigid interpretation of Judaism that he believed violated the Gospel Good News doctrine. In his works, he often and repeatedly articulated his negative views on the differences between Jewish and Xtian thought, often positioning the Talmud in a despicable light. His ignorance of T’NaCH and Talmud as common law which rejects Roman statute law exposes his racial bias coupled with his total ignorance of what separates and distinguishes Jewish common law ruled by lateral courtrooms from vertical State bribed and employed Judges and prosecuting attorneys whose job served to defend and maintain the statute laws imposed by the State and their bureaucrats. This total failure to discern between the Jewish concept of faith – which revolves around judicial fair compensation for damages inflicted – with the Xtian notion of faith, which employs theology and creeds to define a Top-down dictate how the faithful sheep MUST believe in God.

   J’aimeAimé par 3 personnes

   Réponse

   • The Revisionist History Fraud the post WWII United Nations, which makes a public pedophile debauchery of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
     ____________________________________
     ____________________________________
     KaustubhaReflections

     The Trial of Aung San Suu Kyi: From Icon to Inmate
     KaustubhaReflections·kaustubhareflections.com

     “In politics, there are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends—only permanent interests.” — Winston Churchill. Or perhaps just Bhola again, rearranging the furniture of wisdom while…
     ___________________________________
     ___________________________________
     I hate Winston Churchill. He authored the 1st While Paper in 1923 which proved that London had no intention to respect the 1917 Balfour Declaration upon which the League of Nations based its 1922 Palestine Mandate. In 1939 the Two-State Solution coward PM Chamberlain following the disgrace to surrendering the Czech Republic to Hitler in ’38, then passed the 2nd White Paper which determined an international decision starting with FDR’s US to close all international borders to Jews seeking to flee from the European Nazi sub-human barbarians. Europe has a reputation for back stabbing treachery. De Gaul betrayed its alliance with Israel just prior to the outbreak of the June 1967 war wherein President Nasser of Egypt swore that in this war the Arabs would complete the Nazi Shoah genocide of the Jews. Prior to the outbreak of that war Tel Aviv ordered the digging of mass graves!

     Neutral England and France did not long maintain their “neutrality”. The UN forced a cease fire after only 6 Days of fighting. The countries of the Middle East – all of which – only recently attained their “political independence as nation state” had not stomach for a long drawn out war. Israel, just for an example, its population – about 2.5 million people. Our economy could ill afford a million soldiers fighting at the front for more than just a few days.

     Post war just as England and France attempted and failed to seize the Suez Canal – and therein dominate the balance of power across the Middle East, so too and how much more so after Stalin and Ike told those 2nd rate European powers to peddle their papers elsewhere, (with LBJ tied down in Vietnam) Britain and France attempted a revisionist history at the UN with their UN SC Resolution 242 which sought to pretend that the Arabs did not disastrously lose the 6 Day War.

     LBJ raped the leadership of President Eisenhower ’56 agreement cut with PM David Ben Gurion wherein Israel agreed to return the captured Sinai Desert back to Egypt in return of the US reducing the Great Power status of both England (who won WWII) and arrogant France (who lost WWII). LBJ permitted both London and France to once again pretend themselves to be Great Powers who possessed the power to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East.

     The huge distinction of character between Ike an LBJ compares to the stark contrast between Obama (who passed UN SC Resolution 2334 which utterly negated the Israeli victory in the June 6th Six Day War), with that of the integrity of Donald John Trump who established the Abraham Accords which utterly negated the British and French 242 and later post ’73 UN 338 Resolutions of revisionist history.

     In 1948 Israel won its political and National Independence as a nation. Regardless, the UN continually attempt to make revisionist history and pretends, to this very day, that it has the rightful authority to determine the Capital City of Israel and its international borders! Bunk. Utter and complete horseradish. Israel, as an independent nation, the wars it fights and either wins or loses with its closest and immediate neighbor nation states – the outcome of these fought wars – they and only they determine the international borders Israel shares with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

     And here’s the rub. Second rate pretend “Great Powers” rape the UN in order to impose revisionist history upon the tiny Jewish state of Israel. In the Oct 7th Abomination War, South Africa’s revisionist history pretends that it has the moral mandate to declare Israel guilty of duplicating the Nazi Shoah genocide of Gaza Arabs. No nation ever accused post Dec7th 1941 Pearl Harbor America of committing genocide or starving the populations of the Japanese or the Nazis during WWII. Israel drops leaflet warnings to the general populations of an area within a town before actually bombing the region. The US made 1000 plane raids over Tokyo and Dresden; and dropped two atomic bombs. Yet South Africa and the ICC Rome treaty court of the Hague accuses Israel of committing genocide?!

     Second rate pretend ‘Great Powers’ rape the UN and use this forum which permits nations to conduct public diplomacy together, these charlatan frauds ‘Great Powers’, they without shame attempt to re-write history in their own bloated Ego image. The UN permits nations in the General Assembly and even sitting in the expanded Security Council to condemn Israel who do not even have diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. Bunk. That’s not public diplomacy, but rather political rhetoric propaganda on an imaginary World Government scale!

     J’aimeAimé par 1 personne

     Réponse

   • The UN a tits on a boar hog utterly useless nonsense institution. Both the League of Nations and the UN failed from day one because neither “World government” has accountability of its corrupt bureaucraps.

     In situations where there are significant conflicts of interest among stakeholders, achieving compliance with environmental agreements, such as those aimed at reducing plastic pollution, becomes exceedingly difficult. Without the ability to impose penalties or sanctions, compliance relies heavily on voluntary participation and goodwill among nations. Only have to examine UN Human Rights Commissions to see how it become a perverted joke on matters of Human Rights.

     The comparison to the UN Human Rights Commissions highlights a broader issue in international governance where enforcement mechanisms are often weak or nonexistent. Without robust enforcement mechanisms, such as penalties or sanctions, there is little incentive for countries to comply with agreements. This can lead to a lack of accountability and a perception that violations will go unpunished.

     The inability to enforce compliance can erode trust among nations, making future negotiations more challenging. If countries perceive that others are not held accountable, they may be less likely to commit to new agreements. The perception that international bodies are ineffective can lead to public disillusionment with global governance. This can diminish support for international cooperation on critical issues like climate change and plastic pollution.

     The absence of strong accountability mechanisms within organizations like the UN can lead to perceptions of ineffectiveness. When member states can act without fear of repercussions, it undermines the credibility of international agreements. Concerns about bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption can further erode trust in these institutions. When stakeholders believe that decisions are influenced by self-interest rather than collective good, it diminishes the legitimacy of the organization. Without enforceable penalties, countries may prioritize their national interests over global commitments, leading to inconsistent adherence to agreements.

     Countries, like Israel, feel that others are not held accountable for their actions, they may be less inclined to engage in future negotiations or agreements. Nation states should all together not rely upon the international market place of international diplomacy to conduct their alliance interests with other nation states. Only face to face alliances, following the model of the Rome Treaty which established the International Court of the Hague should merit nation state respect and honor.

     International diplomacy stands upon cutting alliances and shared interests between nation states. Public forums which permit nations to air their propaganda accomplishes absolutely nothing. International diplomacy compares to a Man and woman building a family together. Whereas UN propaganda forums compare to a public whore house.

     Effective international diplomacy relies on building strong, trust-based relationships between nations. Just as a successful family requires communication, understanding, and shared goals, so too does international diplomacy thrive on mutual respect and collaboration. Alliances formed on shared interests and values can lead to more effective cooperation. When nations work together towards common goals, they can address global challenges more effectively, whether in security, trade, or environmental issues.

     Public forums, such as the UN, invarably devolve into platforms of propaganda rather than constructive dialogue. This leads to a perception that these gatherings exist more about posturing than genuine problem-solving. Nation States who do not share diplomatic relations with other countries « international law » should directly bar them from using the UN as a public forum to vent their spleen of hatred toward enemy states. To reform the UN requires that only states sharing embassies and ambassadors have the right to publicly criticize other nation state governments through the medium of UN Resolutions. Diplomacy simply not a popularity contest and how much more so a beauty contest where contestants strut around in bikinis – like chickens with their heads cut off.

     The UN international whore-house promotes political venereal diseases and mental insanity – like as suffered by George III during the American Revolution. States with established embassies and ambassadors should have the right to publicly criticize other nation states. This would clearly lead to a more accountable and respectful UN environment. This approach forces nations to engage in diplomacy rather than resorting to public UN denunciations and Resolutions of condemnation. Implementing accountability measures for nations that misuse public forums for propaganda an absolute basic fundamental which the UN currently publicly prostitutes.

     Banning Chapter VI UN General Assembly or even Security Council Resolutions of Condemnation: this worthless destructive condition within the UN Charter – merits immediate erasure. The UN simply not in the business of determining the international borders of member nation states, and how much more so the Capital Cities of their country. UN member states have no authority to promote revolution or Civil War in the domestic affairs of other UN member states. The Korean War an international disgrace and disaster. The UN Charter of Chapter VII dictates and direct threats of war has no place in the UN founding Charter.

     J’aimeJ’aime

     Réponse

3. Arab Revisionist History duplicates New Testament revisionist history of the Hebrew T’NaCH.
   ______________________________________
   The Villages Group: Cooperation in Israel-Palestine

   Sep 4/5 2025: Settlers Perpetrate Massive night Pogrom at Khalet a-Dab’e
   Khalet a-Dab’e is in the heart of Masafer Yatta. Somewhat unusually for the region’s Palestinian villages, it sits atop a high hill. That could be one reason why the military and settlers have targeted it so relentlessly. Last week on the night between Thursday and Friday (September 4/5), dozens of settlers descended upon Khalet a-Dab’e and perpetrated a pogrom. At least 50-60 criminals, apparently from the entire region’s settlements and outposts, entered the village and immediately assaulted residents of all ages with bats and iron rods.
   ______________________________________
   Dhimmi Arab refugee populations absolutely reject, together with all other Arab and Muslim countries which refuse to recognize the Jewish state post ’48 and ’67; Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination as defined by the 1917 Balfour Daration and the 1922 Palestine Mandate. Ottoman land laws, which remain on the books in the modern Jewish state today, reject non Ottoman Muslims, both Jews and Arabs from owning Ottoman lands. Dhimmi stateless Arab refugees promote revisionist history, in point of fact during Ottoman rule Arabs existed at best as share-croppers.

   Arab Muslim rejection of Zionism rooted in Arab rejection of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab countries opposed and voted against the UN General Assembly vote of 1948 wherein 2/3rds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East as the Palestinian Mandate originally authorized.

   The status of dhimmi Arab populations in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex, with many Palestinians identifying as refugees or stateless individuals due to the historical events surrounding the establishment of Israel.

   J’aimeJ’aime

   Réponse

   • Religious masturbation, how utterly depressing

     _____________________________________________
     Intentional Faith

     Intentional Faith·pastorhogg.net

     The Weight and Gift of the Cross
     As the day concludes, reflections on Matthew 10:38 prompt meditation on discipleship through the cross. Embracing this cross, representing surrender and sacrifice, leads to true freedom and intimacy with Christ. With prayer for strength and guidance, we are….
     _____________________________________________
     Both fail to grasp the Torah concept of Sacrifices as the medium wherein the chosen Cohen People swear a Torah oath to employ tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Both works of fiction and revisionist history perceive God like powers awarded and bestowed from undefined Father who bestows magical powers upon his chosen beloved. Both mythical characters of Harry Potter and JeZeus make the ultimate sacrifice and sacrifice their lives as the pathway to achieve ”salvation”. Both fictional narratives fail to define either how the Torah understands the meaning of terms like prophesy and love.

     Both narratives create fantastical worlds where mythical beings possess extraordinary powers. In Harry Potter, magic serves as a metaphor for personal growth and moral choices, while in the Gospels, miraculous events are often interpreted as divine intervention. These cultural stories of ancient Hebrews and modern British witch societies, they both reflect cultural narratives that shape our understanding of good and evil, morality, and the human experience, often using fantastical elements to convey deeper emotional belief systems.

     J’aimeJ’aime

     Réponse